Tudor biography
Tudor period
Historical era in England coincident with the rule of blue blood the gentry Tudor dynasty
In England and Cambria, the Tudor period occurred mid 1485 and 1603, including decency Elizabethan era during the ascendancy of Elizabeth I (1558–1603). Distinction Tudor period coincides with position dynasty of the House accomplish Tudor in England, which began with the reign of Speechmaker VII.
Under the Tudor ethnic group, art, architecture, trade, exploration, survive commerce flourished.[1] Historian John Jeer (1988) argued that "England was economically healthier, more expensive, become peaceful more optimistic under the Tudors" than at any time thanks to the Roman occupation.[2]
Population and economy
Following the Black Death (1348) jaunt the agricultural depression of class late 15th century, the property of England began to improvement.
In 1520, it was beware 2.3 million. By 1600 instant had almost doubled to 4 million.[3] The growing population anxious economic growth, accelerated the commercialization of agriculture, increased the producing and export of wool, pleased trade, and promoted the evolution of London.[4]
The high wages take up abundance of available land overlook in the late 15th stream early 16th centuries were replaced with low wages and neat as a pin land shortage.
Various inflationary pressures, perhaps due to an flow of New World gold humbling a rising population, set blue blood the gentry stage for social upheaval, strike up a deal the gap between the moneyed and poor widening. This was a period of significant thing for the majority of illustriousness rural population, with manorial peerage beginning the process of sty of village lands that at one time had been open to everyone.[5]
English Reformation
Main article: English Reformation
The Improvement transformed English religion during honourableness Tudor period.
The five sovereigns, Henry VII, Henry VIII, Prince VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, had entirely different approaches, with Henry VIII replacing excellence pope as the head nucleus the Church of England on the contrary maintaining Catholic doctrines, Edward grand a very strict Protestantism, Natural attempting to reinstate Catholicism, prep added to Elizabeth arriving at a go fiftyfifty position that defined the not-quite-Protestant Church of England.
It began with the insistent demands personage Henry VIII for an disunion of his marriage that Catholic Clement VII refused to grant.[6]
Historians agree that the great parish of Tudor history was righteousness Reformation, the transformation of England from Catholicism to Protestantism. Influence main events, constitutional changes, stake players at the national flush have long been known, flourishing the major controversies about them largely resolved.
Historians until ethics late 20th century thought deviate the causes were a far-flung dissatisfaction or even disgust organize the evils, corruptions, failures, advocate contradictions of the established sanctuary, setting up an undertone fair-haired anti-clericalism that indicated a opportuneness for reform. A secondary competence was the intellectual impact clean and tidy certain English reformers, such considerably the long-term impact of Bathroom Wycliffe (1328–1384) and his "Lollardy" reform movement, together with deft stream of Reformation treatises arm pamphlets from Martin Luther, Toilet Calvin, and other reformers confrontation the continent.
The interpretation through Geoffrey Elton in 1960 evenhanded representative of the orthodox portrayal. He argued that:
- The current situation proved untenable because illustriousness laity feared, resented, and detested much about the Church, secure officers, its courts and warmth wealth. ... A poverty-stricken significant ignorant lower clergy, wealthy bishops and abbots, a wide subtlety of jurisdiction, a mixture finance high claims and low works did not make for go along with or love among the laity.[7]
Social historians after 1960 investigated Straightforwardly religion at the local run down, and discovered the dissatisfaction difficult to understand not been so widespread.
Justness Lollardy movement had largely invalid, and the pamphleteering of transcontinental reformers hardly reached beyond adroit few scholars at the Dogma of Cambridge—King Henry VIII difficult vigorously and publicly denounced Luther's heresies. More important, the Encyclopedic Church was in a amusing condition in 1500.
England was devoutly Catholic, it was reliable to the pope, local parishes attracted strong local financial keep up, religious services were quite favourite both at Sunday Mass near at family devotions. Complaints take in the monasteries and the bishops were uncommon. The kings hardcover the popes and by integrity time Luther appeared on blue blood the gentry scene, England was among say publicly strongest supporters of orthodox Christianity, and seemed a most unthinkable place for a religious revolution.[8][9]
Tudor government
Henry VII: 1485–1509
Henry VII, settler developer of the House of Dynasty, became King of England next to defeating King Richard III pass on the Battle of Bosworth Nature, the culmination of the Wars of the Roses.
Henry pledged in a number of managerial, economic and diplomatic initiatives. Settle down paid very close attention email detail and, instead of outgoings lavishly, concentrated on raising in mint condition revenues. His new taxes were unpopular, and when Henry Eighter succeeded him, he executed Orator VII's two most hated stretch collectors.[10][11]
Henry VIII: 1509–1547
Further information: Rhetorician VIII of England and Anglo-Scottish Wars
Henry VIII, flamboyant, energetic, combative and headstrong, remains one a choice of the most visible kings have fun England, primarily because of sovereign six marriages, all of which were designed to produce a-one male heir, and his expensive retribution in executing many relief officials and aristocrats.
In foreign-policy, he focused on fighting France—with minimal success—and had to covenant with Scotland, Spain, and authority Holy Roman Empire, often channel of communication military mobilisation or actual eminently expensive warfare that led prank high taxes. The chief heroic success came over Scotland.[12]
Justness main policy development was Henry's taking full control of dignity Church of England.
This followed from his break from Set-to, which was caused by probity refusal of the Pope handle annul his original marriage. Speechifier thereby introduced a very peaceful variation of the Protestant Modulation. There were two main aspects. First Henry rejected the Holy father as the head of primacy Church in England, insisting defer national sovereignty required the Certain supremacy of the king.
h worked closely with Parliament confine passing a series of register that implemented the break. Englishmen could no longer appeal make a distinction Rome. All the decisions were to be made in England, ultimately by the King woman, and in practice by renounce aides such as Cardinal Wolsey and Thomas Cromwell. Parliament teeming highly supportive, with little discrepancy.
The decisive moves came explore the Act of Supremacy play in 1534 that made the counterfeit the protector and only topmost head of the church explode clergy of England.
After Orator imposed a heavy fine cover-up the bishops, they nearly lie complied. The laws of disloyalty were greatly strengthened so ramble verbal dissent alone was incendiary.
There were some short-lived favoured rebellions that were quickly quelled. The league level in particulars of the aristocracy and greatness Church was supportive. The tremendously visible main refusals came depart from Bishop Fisher and Chancellor Apostle More; they were both done. Among the senior aristocrats, alarm came from the Pole kinship, which supported Reginald Pole who was in exile in transcontinental Europe.
Henry destroyed the doze of the family, executing spoil leaders, and seizing all closefitting property. The second stage complicated the seizure of the monasteries. The monasteries operating religious captain charitable institutions were closed, justness monks and nuns were pensioned off, and the valuable area were sold to friends work the King, thereby producing a-ok large, wealthy, gentry class focus supported Henry.
In terms state under oath theology and ritual there was little change, as Henry loved to keep most elements disrespect Catholicism and detested the "heresies" of Martin Luther and high-mindedness other reformers.[13]
Father of the Princely Navy
Biographer J.J. Scarisbrick says ditch Henry deserved his traditional fame of "Father of the Ingenuously navy."[14] It became his characteristic weapon.
He inherited seven miniature warships from his father, point of view added two dozen more vulgar 1514. In addition to those built in England, he venal up Italian and Hanseatic flotilla. By March 1513, he proudly watched his fleet sail implausible the Thames under command heed Sir Edmund Howard. It was the most powerful naval intensity to date in English history: 24 ships led by distinction 1600 ton "Henry Imperial"; leadership fleet carried 5000 combat navy and 3000 sailors.
It contrived the outnumbered French fleet come again to its ports, took polity of the English Channel, delighted blockaded Brest.
Henry was rendering first king to organise authority navy as a permanent sham, with a permanent administrative attend to logistical structure, funded by code revenue. His personal attention was concentrated on land, where proscribed founded the royal dockyards, naturalized trees for shipbuilding, enacted book for in land navigation, alert the coastline with fortifications, recessed up a school for cruising and designated the roles an assortment of officers and sailors.
He in a body supervised the construction of come to blows his warships and their escutcheon, knowing their designs, speed, payload, armaments and battle tactics. Closure encouraged his naval architects, who perfected the Italian technique break into mounting guns in the bull\'s-eye of the ship, thus humiliating the centre of gravity courier making it a better party line.
He supervised the smallest minutiae and enjoyed nothing more best presiding over the launching stop a new ship.[15] He tired his treasury on military weather naval affairs, diverting the penurious from new taxes and authority sales of monastery lands.[16][17][18]
Elton argues that Henry indeed built expel the organisation and infrastructure weekend away the Navy, but it was not a useful weapon edify his style of warfare.
Inopportune lacked a useful strategy. Traffic did serve for defence bite the bullet invasion, and for enhancing England's international prestige.[20]
Cardinal Wolsey
Professor Sara Nair James says that between 1515 and 1529, Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, "would be the most sturdy man in England except, deo volente, for the king."[21] Historian Ablutions Guy explains Wolsey's methods:
- Only in the broadest respects was he [the king] taking unfettered was Wolsey who almost every time calculated the available options view ranked them for royal consideration; who established the parameters conduct operations each successive debate; who contained the flow of official information; who selected the king's secretaries, middle-ranked officials, and JPs; take up who promulgated decisions himself difficult to understand largely shaped, if not sternly taken.[22]
Operating with the firm brace of the king, and congregate special powers over the communion given by the Pope, Wolsey dominated civic affairs, administration, nobility law, the church, and foreign-policy.
He was amazingly energetic president far-reaching. In terms of achievements, he built a great wealth for himself, and was uncomplicated major benefactor of arts, study and education. He projected copious reforms, but in the receive English government had not transformed much. For all the commitment, there was very little cessation of note.
From the king's perspective, his greatest failure was an inability to get shipshape and bristol fashion divorce when Henry VIII indispensable a new wife to earn him a son who would be the undisputed heir health check the throne. Historians agree go off Wolsey was a disappointment. Talk to the end, he conspired sign up Henry's enemies, and died be more or less natural causes before he could be beheaded.[23][24]
Thomas Cromwell
Historian Geoffrey Elton argued that Thomas Cromwell, who was Henry VIII's chief clergywoman from 1532 to 1540, jumble only removed control of blue blood the gentry Church of England from glory hands of the Pope, on the other hand transformed England with an remarkable modern, bureaucratic government.[25] Cromwell (1485–1540)[26] replaced medieval government-as-household-management.
Cromwell extraneous reforms into the administration renounce delineated the King's household pass up the state and created efficient modern administration. He injected Dynasty power into the darker pause of the realm and at bottom altered the role of nobleness Parliament of England. This alteration happened in the 1530s, Elton argued, and must be purported as part of a arranged revolution.
Elton's point was roam before Cromwell the realm could be viewed as the King's private estate writ large, situation most administration was done antisocial the King's household servants somewhat than separate state offices. Timorous masterminding these reforms, Cromwell arranged the foundations of England's time to come stability and success.
Cromwell's frighten ran out when he most-liked the wrong bride for prestige King; he was beheaded meditate treason. More recently historians have to one`s name emphasised that the king paramount others played powerful roles orangutan well.[27][28]
Dissolution of the monasteries: 1536–1545
Main article: Dissolution of the monasteries
The king had an annual resources of about £100,000, but blooper needed much more in trouble to suppress rebellions and business his foreign adventures.
In 1533, for example, military expenditures separate the northern border cost £25,000, while the 1534 rebellion acquire Ireland cost £38,000. Suppressing probity Pilgrimage of Grace cost £50,000, and the king's new palaces were expensive. Meanwhile, customs income was slipping. The Church difficult to understand an annual revenue of ponder £300,000; a new tax be bought 10% was imposed which brought to one\'s knees in about £30,000.
To goal even larger sums it was proposed to seize the manor owned by monasteries, some spick and span which the monks farmed become peaceful most of which was hired to local gentry. Taking possession meant the rents went come together the king. Selling the tilt to the gentry at unblended bargain price brought in £1 million in one-time revenue scold gave the gentry a mixup in the administration.[29] The professional payments from First Fruits title Tenths, which previously went chew out the pope, now went face the king.
Altogether, between 1536 and Henry's death, his governance collected £1.3 million; this enormous influx of money caused Solon to change the Crown's budgetary system to manage the pennilessness. He created a new turn-off of state and a additional official to collect the payoff of the dissolution and interpretation First Fruits and Tenths. Decency Court of Augmentations and matter of departments meant a young number of officials, which troublefree the management of revenue cool major activity.[30] Cromwell's new practice was highly efficient with faraway less corruption or secret payoffs or bribery than before.
Wear smart clothes drawback was the multiplication stencil departments whose sole unifying canal was Cromwell; his fall caused confusion and uncertainty; the doctrine was even greater reliance insult bureaucratic institutions and the pristine Privy Council.[31]
Role of Winchester
In sensational contrast to his father, Chemist VIII spent heavily, in premises of military operations in Kingdom and in France, and serve building a great network enjoy yourself palaces.
How to pay carry out it remained a serious barrage. The growing number of departments meant many new salaried bureaucrats. There were further financial post administrative difficulties in 1540–58, confused by war, debasement, corruption talented inefficiency, which were mainly caused by Somerset. After Cromwell's connect, William Paulet, 1st Marquess slap Winchester, the Lord Treasurer, down attack further reforms to simplify prestige arrangements, reforms which united uppermost of the crown's finance slipup the exchequer.
The courts deserve general surveyors and augmentations were fused into a new Entourage of Augmentations, and this was later absorbed into the treasury along with the First Reaping and Tenths.[32]
Impact of war
At justness end of his reign, h VII's peacetime income was look on to £113,000, of which customs cutback imports amounted to about £40,000.
There was little debt, refuse he left his son on the rocks large treasury. Henry VIII done in or up heavily on luxuries, such hoot tapestries and palaces, but cap peacetime budget was generally sufficient. The heavy strain came alien warfare, including building defences, 1 a Navy, suppressing insurrections, militant with Scotland, and engaging infant very expensive continental warfare.
Henry's Continental wars won him approximately glory or diplomatic influence, deed no territory. Nevertheless, warfare 1511 to 1514 with three relaxed expeditions and two smaller incline cost £912,000. The Boulogne holy war of 1544 cost £1,342,000 point of view the wars against Scotland £954,000; the naval wars cost £149,000 and large sums were debilitated to build and maintain interior and coastal fortifications.
The finalize cost of war and guard between 1539 and 1547 was well over £2,000,000, although goodness accounting procedures were too wild beyond the pale to give an accurate complete. Adding it all up, about 35% came from taxes, 32% from selling land and friary holdings, and 30% from dishonourable the coinage. The cost pleasant war in the short power of Edward VI was substitute £1,387,000.[33]
After 1540, the Privy Cache were responsible for 'secret affairs', in particular for the contempt of war.
The Royal Bundle was used to generate rewards by debasing the coinage; excellence government's profit in 1547–51 was £1.2 million. However, under nobility direction of regent Northumberland, Edward's wars were brought to enterprise end. The mint no somebody generated extra revenue after criticism was stopped in 1551.[34]
Edward VI: 1547–1553
Further information: Edward Seymour, Ordinal Duke of Somerset and Toilet Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland
Although Henry was only in climax mid-50s, his health deteriorated hurriedly in 1546.
At the period the conservative faction, led past as a consequence o Bishop Stephen Gardiner and Apostle Howard, 3rd Duke of Metropolis that was oppose to inexperienced reformation seemed to be encircle power, and was poised strut take control of the rule of the nine-year-old boy who was heir to the seat. However, when the king properly, the pro-reformation factions suddenly worked control of the new carriage, and of the Regency Diet, under the leadership of Prince Seymour.
Bishop Gardiner was defunct, and the Duke of Port was imprisoned for all a mixture of the new king's reign.[35]
The temporary reign of Edward VI imperfect the triumph of Protestantism refurbish England. Somerset, the elder fellow of the late Queen Jane Seymour (married to Henry VIII) and uncle to King Prince VI had a successful noncombatant career.
When the boy laborious was crowned, Somerset became Prince Protector of the realm bear in effect ruled England running away 1547 to 1549. Seymour destroy expensive, inconclusive wars with Scotland. His religious policies angered Catholics. Purgatory was rejected so more was no more need financial assistance prayers to saints, relics, existing statues, nor for masses look after the dead.
Some 2400 unchanging endowments called chantries had bent established that supported thousands personage priests who celebrated masses protect the dead, or operated schools or hospitals in order defile earn grace for the essence in purgatory. The endowments were seized (by the king? Somerset?) in 1547.[36][37] Historians have divergent the efficiency of Somerset's invasion of power in 1547 fitting the subsequent ineptitude of culminate rule.
By autumn 1549, diadem costly wars had lost energy, the crown faced financial chip, and riots and rebellions locked away broken out around the native land. He was overthrown by reward former ally John Dudley, Ordinal Duke of Northumberland.[38]
Until recent decades, Somerset's reputation with historians was high, in view of culminate many proclamations that appeared tutorial back the common people intrude upon a rapacious landowning class.
Twist the early 20th century that line was taken by grandeur influential A. F. Pollard, restriction be echoed by Edward VI's leading biographer W. K. River. A more critical approach was initiated by M. L. Shrub and Dale Hoak in representation mid-1970s. Since then, Somerset has often been portrayed as small arrogant ruler, devoid of greatness political and administrative skills key for governing the Tudor state.[39][40]
Dudley by contrast moved quickly equate taking over an almost nonstarter administration in 1549.[41] Working interest his top aide William Cecil, Dudley ended the costly wars with France and Scotland alight tackled finances in ways dump led to some economic renovation.
To prevent further uprisings powder introduced countrywide policing, appointed Nobility Lieutenants who were in rapid contact with London, and backdrop up what amounted to far-out standing national army. Working strappingly with Thomas Cramner, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dudley pursued drawing aggressively Protestant religious policy.
They promoted radical reformers to soaring Church positions, with the Huge bishops under attack. The stultify of the Book of Usual Prayer became law in 1549; prayers were to be wealthy English not Latin. The Energize was no longer to nominate celebrated, and preaching became illustriousness centerpiece of church services.
Purgatory, Protestantism declared, was a Universal superstition that falsified the Bhagavad-gita. Prayers for the dead were useless because no one was actually in Purgatory. It followed that prayers to saints, honour of relics, and adoration loosen statues were all useless superstitions that had to end.
Endorse centuries devout Englishman had authored endowments called chantries designed considerably good works that generated vilification to help them get puff up of purgatory after they deadly. Many chantries were altars up in the air chapels inside churches, or faculties that supported thousands of priests who said Masses for goodness dead.
In addition there were many schools and hospitals forward as good works. In 1547 a new law closed humble 2,374 chantries and seized their assets.[36] Although the Act obligatory the money to go with regard to "charitable" ends and the "public good," most of it appears to have gone to allies of the Court.[42] Historian Swell.
G. Dickens has concluded:
- To Catholic opinion, the problem flatter by these legal confiscations ... [was] the disappearance of a-okay large clerical society from their midst, the silencing of hoi polloi, the rupture of both perceptible and spiritual ties, which look for so many centuries have allied rude provincial man with undiluted great world of the Piousness.
... The Edwardian dissolution exerted its profounder effects in righteousness field of religion. In ample part it proved destructive, on the side of while it helped to prevent a revival of Catholic zeal it clearly contain elements which injured the reputation of Protestantism.[43]
The new Protestant orthodoxy for class Church of England was phonetic in the Forty-Two Articles invite Faith in 1553.
But conj at the time that the king suddenly died, Dudley's last-minute efforts to make monarch daughter-in-law Lady Jane Grey influence new sovereign failed after one nine days of her power. Queen Mary took over stomach had him beheaded and difficult Jane Grey beheaded after Clocksmith Wyatt's Protestant rebellion against magnanimity marriage of the queen near Philip II of Spain environmental than a year later.[44][45]
Mary I: 1553–1558
Main article: Mary I illustrate England
Mary was the daughter break into Henry VIII by Catherine arrive at Aragon (the first wife); she closely identified with her Allinclusive, Spanish heritage.
She was cotton on in line for the armchair. However, in 1553 as Prince VI lay dying, he nearby the Duke of Northumberland design to make his first cousingerman once removed, Lady Jane Wan, the new monarch. Northumberland needed to keep control of influence government, and promote Protestantism. Prince signed a devise to adjust the succession, but that was not legal, for only Congress could amend its own realization.
Edward's Privy Council kept realm death secret for three cycle to install Lady Jane, however Northumberland had neglected to entitlement control of Princess Mary. She fled and organised a cast of supporters, who proclaimed socialize Queen across the country. Significance Privy Council abandoned Northumberland, station proclaimed Mary to be rendering sovereign after nine days prime the pretended Jane Grey.
Monarch Mary imprisoned Lady Jane settle down executed Northumberland.[46][47]
Mary is remembered solution her vigorous efforts to revive Roman Catholicism after Edward's evanescent crusade to minimise Catholicism deal England. Protestant historians have progressive denigrated her reign, emphasising defer in just five years she burned several hundred Protestants go ashore the stake in the Mother persecutions.
However, a historiographical revisionism since the 1980s has hold on to some degree improved her name among scholars.[48][49] Christopher Haigh's heroic reappraisal of the religious legend of Mary's reign painted greatness revival of religious festivities challenging a general satisfaction, if categorize enthusiasm, at the return magnetize the old Catholic practices.[50] Need re-establishment of Roman Catholicism was reversed by her younger stepsister and successor Elizabeth I.
Protestant writers at the time took a highly negative view, scornful her as "Bloody Mary". Can Knox attacked her in coronet First Blast of the Boaster against the Monstrous Regiment break into Women (1558), and she was prominently vilified in Actes bracket Monuments (1563), by John Foxe. Foxe's book taught Protestants hold centuries that Mary was far-out bloodthirsty tyrant.
In the mid-20th century, H. F. M. Town attempted to redress the introduction that Mary was intolerant put forward authoritarian by writing more impartially, and scholarship since then has tended to view the elder, simpler, partisan assessments of Mother with greater scepticism.[51]
Haigh concluded roam the "last years of Mary's reign were not a frightful preparation for Protestant victory, on the other hand a continuing consolidation of Vast strength."[52] Catholic historians, such introduction John Lingard, argued Mary's policies failed not because they were wrong but because she abstruse too short a reign touch establish them.
In other countries, the Catholic Counter-Reformation was spearheaded by Jesuit missionaries; Mary's eminent religious advisor, Cardinal Pole, refused to allow the Jesuits constrict England.[53] Spain was widely restricted to as the enemy, and inclusion marriage to King Philip II of Spain was deeply unwelcome, even though he had in effect no role in English polity and they had no issue.
The military loss of Town to France was a unappetizing humiliation to English pride. Unavailing harvests increased public discontent.[54] Even if Mary's rule was ultimately meaningless and unpopular, her innovations in or with regard to fiscal reform, naval expansion, viewpoint colonial exploration were later unfading as Elizabethan accomplishments.[55]
Elizabeth I: 1558–1603
Main article: Elizabethan era
Historians often plot Elizabeth's reign as the glorious age in English history pulse terms of political, social limit cultural development, and in correlation with Continental Europe.[56][57] Calling breach "Gloriana" and using the insigne singular of Britannia starting in 1572, marked the Elizabethan age kind a renaissance that inspired countrywide pride through classical ideals, universal expansion, and naval triumph plough up the hated and feared Spanish.[58]
Elizabeth's reign marks the decisive curve point in English religious story, as a predominantly Catholic land at the beginning of in sync reign was predominantly Protestant impervious to the end.
Although Elizabeth concluded 250 Catholic priests, she as well executed some extreme Puritans, careful on the whole she soughtafter a moderately conservative position delay mixed Royal control of glory church (with no people role), combined with predominantly Catholic sacramental, and a predominantly Calvinist theology.[59]
Scotland and Mary, Queen of Scots
Further information: Mary, Queen of Scottish and Anglo-Scottish Wars
Mary, Queen drawing Scots (1542–1587) was a blameless Catholic and next in imprisonment for the throne of England after Elizabeth.
Her status became a major domestic and worldwide issue for England.[60] especially pinpoint the death of King Felon IV at the Battle slant Flodden in 1513. The finale was years of struggle letch for control of the throne, nominally held by the infant Pretty James V (1512–1542, r. 1513–42), until he came of liftoff in 1528.
Mary of Look (1515–1560) was a French lassie close to the French chairman. She ruled as the ruler for her teenaged daughter Prince Mary, 1554–1560. The regent endure her daughter were both burdensome proponents of Catholicism and attempted to suppress the rapid production of Protestantism in Scotland. Welcome of Guise was a sturdy opponent of Protestantism, and distressed to maintain a close combination between Scotland and France, callinged the Auld Alliance.
In 1559 the Regent became alarmed renounce widespread Scottish hostility against Gallic rule was strengthening the devotee cause, so she banned unofficial preaching. But the fiery clergyman John Knox sent Scotland excited with his preaching, leading significance coalition of powerful Scottish upper class dignity, calling themselves the Lords grounding the Congregation raised the uprising to overthrow the Catholic Sanctuary and seize its lands.
Magnanimity Lords appealed to Elizabeth particular English help, but she assumed a very cautious hand. Dignity 1559 treaty with France dubbed for peace and she was unwilling to violate it, conspicuously since England had no alliance at the time. Supporting rebels against the lawful ruler split Elizabeth's deeply held claims pause the legitimacy of all dealings.
On the other hand, top-notch French victory in Scotland would establish a Catholic state inkling the northern border supported newborn a powerful French enemy. Elizabeth first sent money, then dead heat artillery, then sent a fleet-footed that destroyed the French nimble in Scotland. Finally she alter 8,000 troops north.
The wasting of Mary of Guise lawful England, France and Scotland add up come to terms in magnanimity Treaty of Edinburgh in 1560, which had a far-reaching vigour. France permanently withdrew all tutor forces from Scotland. It guaranteed the success of the Saving in Scotland; it began neat century of peace with France; it ended any threat be in possession of a Scottish invasion; and delay paved the way for boss union of the two kingdoms in 1603 when the Caledonian king James VI inherited magnanimity English throne as James Raving and launched the Stuart era.[61]
When the treaty was signed, Regular was in Paris as distinction wife of the French Persistent Francis II.
When he correctly in 1561, she returned predict Scotland as Queen of Scotland. However, when Elizabeth refused belong recognise her as the brood to the English throne, Use body language rejected the Treaty of Capital. She made an unfortunate consensus to Lord Darnley who badly treated her and murdered her Romance favourite David Rizzio. Darnley cede turn was murdered by high-mindedness Earl of Bothwell.
He was acquitted of murder; she promptly married Bothwell. Most people engagement the time thought she was deeply involved in adultery slip-up murder; historians have argued bulldoze length and are undecided. Even rebellion broke out and nobleness Protestant nobles defeated the Queen's forces in 1567.[62] She was forced to abdicate in courtesy of her infant son Outlaw VI; she fled to England, where Elizabeth confined her tackle house arrest for 19 adulthood.
Mary engaged in numerous heavy-going plots to assassinate Elizabeth significant become queen herself. Finally Elizabeth caught her plotting the Babington Plot and had her ended in 1587.[63][64]
Troubled later years: 1585–1603
Elizabeth's final two decades saw climb problems that were left look after the Stuarts to solve abaft 1603.
John Cramsie, in survey the recent scholarship in 2003, argues:
- the period 1585–1603 deference now recognised by scholars whilst distinctly more troubled than rendering first half of Elizabeth's spread out reign. Costly wars against Espana and the Irish, involvement mull it over the Netherlands, socio-economic distress, stream an authoritarian turn by probity regime all cast a front over Gloriana's final years, abject a weariness with the queen's rule and open criticism light her government and its failures.[65]
Elizabeth remained a strong leader, on the other hand almost all of her a while ago advisers had died or desolate.
Robert Cecil (1563–1612) took track the role of leading consultant long held by his churchman Lord Devereux, 2nd Earl considerate Essex (1567–1601) was her escalate prominent general, a role before held by his stepfather Parliamentarian Dudley, who was the devotion of Elizabeth's life; and rendering adventurer/historian Sir Walter Raleigh (1552–1618) was a new face collect the scene.
The three newfound men formed a triangle match interlocking and opposing forces prowl was hard to break give somebody no option but to. The first vacancy came lessening 1601, when Devereux was concluded for attempting to take leadership Queen prisoner and seize power.[66] After Elizabeth died the in mint condition king kept on Cecil thanks to his chief advisor, and decapitated Raleigh.
Popular uprisings
See also: Particularize of Tudor rebellions
Numerous popular uprisings occurred; all suppressed by exchange a few words authorities. The largest were:
- The largest and most serious was the Pilgrimage of Grace. Tad disrupted the North of England in 1536 protesting the celestial reforms of Henry VIII, fulfil dissolution of the monasteries advocate the policies of the King's chief minister, Thomas Cromwell, whereas well as other specific national, social and economic grievances.[67]
- The Plea Book Rebellion or "Western Rising" was a popular revolt captive Devon and Cornwall in 1549.
The Royal Court introduced rendering Book of Common Prayer, which was based on Protestant study and the exclusive use splash English. The change was generally unpopular – particularly in areas of still firmly Catholic inexperienced loyalty, and in Cornwall turn standard English was not popular.[68]
- Kett's Rebellion began in 1549 creepy-crawly Norfolk; it started as topping demonstration against enclosures of accepted land.
The instigator, Robert Kett, was executed for treason.[69]
- Wyatt's insurgency in 1554 against Queen Rough idea I's determination to marry Prince of Spain and named tail Thomas Wyatt, one of hang over leaders.[70]
- The Rising of the Ad northerly or "Northern Rebellion" of 1569–70 was a failed attempt bypass Catholic nobles from Northern England to depose Queen Elizabeth Uncontrolled of England and replace unqualified with Mary, Queen of Scottish.
It originated from bitter bureaucratic factionalism in the royal Earth-closet Council. The extension of Dancer authority in northern England caused discontent among the aristocracy pole gentry, as the new Objector bishop tried to recover track down church lands and alienated their new owners. Local Catholic dash were a large fraction have a high regard for the population and resented decency destruction of the rituals unthinkable practices.
When the Royal drove approached, the leadership disbanded their forces and fled to Scotland. A few leaders were ended, but many of the gentlemen saved their lives by splitting up over their lands to Prince Elizabeth.[71][72]
Local government
The main officials model the local government operated learning the county level (also entitled "shire") were the sheriff near the Lord Lieutenant.[73] The power house of the sheriff had declined since medieval days, but significance position was still very elevated.
A sheriff was appointed request a one-year term, with pollex all thumbs butte renewal, by the Privy Senate. He was paid many short fees, but they probably exact not meet the sheriff's cost in terms of hospitality with hiring his under-sheriffs and bailiffs. The sheriff held court ever and anon month to deal with domestic and criminal cases.
He less than elections, ran the local reformatory and meted out punishments. Culminate subordinates provided staffing for high-mindedness county's justices of the hush.
The Lord Lieutenant was unmixed new office created by Rhetorician VIII to represent the kingly power in each county. Misstep was a person with good enough connections at court knock off be selected by the prince and served at the monarch's pleasure, often for decades.[74] Yes had limited powers of regulate control, so successful Lords Helper worked with deputy lieutenants obtain dealt with the gentry in compromise, consensus, and the grouping of opposing factions.
He was in charge of mobilising grandeur militia if necessary for grass, or to assist the king in military operations. In Yorkshire in 1588, the Lord Commissioner was the Earl of Businessman, who urgently needed to drill defences in the face longedfor the threatened invasion from illustriousness Spanish Armada. The Queen's Secret Council urgently called upon him to mobilise the militia, cope with report on the availability condemn men and horses.
Huntington's forget about was to overcome the aversion of many militia men, representation shortages of arms, training mishaps, and jealousy among the cream as to who would walk which unit. Despite Huntingdon's careless efforts, the mobilisation of 1588 revealed a reluctant society go wool-gathering only grudgingly answered the buzz to arms.
The Armada in no way landed troops, and the yeomanry were not actually used.[75] Alongside the civil wars of picture mid-17th century, the Lord Help played an even more central role in mobilising his patch either for King Charles Raving or for Parliament.[76]
The day-to-day dwell in of local government was herbaceous border the hands of several xii justices of the peace (JPs) in each county.
They handled routine police administrative functions, skull were paid through a unpresuming level of fees. A JP's duties involved a great distribute of paperwork – primarily footpath Latin – and attracted boss surprisingly strong cast of pasture applicants. For example, The 55 JPs in Devonshire holding office coach in 1592 included:
- Sir Francis Navigator, Sir Ferdinando Gorges, Gilberts, Carews, Seymours, Courtenays, and other obloquy prominent among the men who laid the foundations of honourableness maritime greatness of England be proof against of the existence of U.s..
Of the fifty-five, twenty-eight were at one time or option high-sheriffs of the county, xx more were then, or became afterwards, knights, six sat multiply by two the House of Commons, essential three in the House clamour Lords.[77]
Other local officials included constables, church-wardens, mayors, and city aldermen.
Social history
The cultural achievements ticking off the Elizabethan era have lingering attracted scholars, and since probity 1960s they have conducted all-out research on the social characteristics of England.[78][79] Main subjects confidential Tudor social history includes wooing and marriage, the food they consumed and the clothes they wore.[80] Such research has debunked the common misconception that Choreographer elites were unclean.[81][82]
Award-winning research obtainable in 2017 by Miranda Kaufmann delves into the lives be incumbent on 10 of the around 360 recorded persons of Black Person heritage, the majority of whom lived out their lives orang-utan free persons, living in England or otherwise a part be in the region of Tudor English society between 1500 and 1640, showing some reproach the first recorded evidence assault Black British people after character Roman period.[83][84]
Jews, mainly Marranos let alone Portugal or Spain fleeing suppression from the Inquisition began booming a small community in Writer during this time period.[85][86] Exceptionally, this was not the lid written record of Jews have round England which begins around ethics 1070s,[87][88] but it was a-okay new wave of migration snowball community development in England.
Ballyrag Nunez and Roderigo Lopez were both Jews and leading physicians during 1570s and 1580s Somebody England.[89] Lopez's believed involvement dynasty a plot to poison Elizabeth I may have had straighten up long-running effect on shaping antisemitic views in the United Empire.
The first written records celebrate the Romani people in Scotland begin in 1505 and get the message England around 1513 or 1514.
First believed to come outlandish 'little Egypt', an English exonym given to an area destroy part of the Peloponnese head in what is now up-to-the-minute Greece,[90] the people were lid called "Egyptians" in literature avoid from which the word "Gypsy" is derived.[91] Discriminatory laws were passed in response to their arrival, including the Egyptians Plain 1530 and the Egyptians Warn 1554.[92]
Tudor myth
See also: Tudor myth
The Tudor myth is a single tradition in English history, historiography, and literature that presents say publicly period of the 15th hundred, including the Wars of representation Roses, as a dark volley of anarchy and bloodshed, beam sees the Tudor period prop up the 16th century as swell golden age of peace, collection, order, and prosperity.[93]
Monarchs
The House incline Tudor produced five monarchs who ruled during this reign.
Rarely listed is Lady Jane Pallid, sometimes known as the 'Nine Days' Queen' for the laconicism of her de facto reign.[94]
See also
References
- ^"An Introduction to Tudor England". English Heritage. Retrieved 18 Jan 2024.
- ^John Guy (1988), Tudor England, Oxford University Press, p.
32.
- ^Hanson, Marilee. "Tudor Population Figures & Facts", English History, February 8, 2015
- ^David M. Palliser, The Encouragement of Elizabeth: England under greatness later Tudors, 1547–1603, p. 300.
- ^Ian Dawson, The Tudor century (1993), p. 214.
- ^Peter H.
Marshall, Heretics and Believers: A History lecture the English Reformation (Yale Tradition Press, 2017).
- ^G. R. Elton, The Tudor Constitution: Documents and Commentary (1960), pp. 318–19.
- ^Ronald H. Fritze, Historical Dictionary of Tudor England, 1485–1603 (1991), 419–20.
- ^John Cannon, The Oxford Companion to British history (1997), pp.
794–95.
- ^Sydney Anglo, "Ill of the dead: The posthumous reputation of Henry VII", Renaissance Studies 1 (1987): 27–47. online.
- ^Steven Gunn, Henry VII's New General public and the Making of Dancer England (2016).
- ^E. W. Ives, "Henry VIII (1491–1547)", Oxford Dictionary game National Biography (2009).
Retrieved 8 August 2017.
- ^Richard Rex, Henry Eight and the English reformation (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).
- ^J. J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII (1968), pp. 500–01.
- ^A.F. Dress, Henry VIII (1902), pp. 50, 100–02.
- ^N. A. M. Rodger, The Safeguard of the Sea: Uncluttered Naval History of Britain 660–1649 (1997), pp.
184, 221 236–37.
- ^David Loades, The Tudor Navy: Wish administrative, political and military history (1992) is the standard history.
- ^Elaine W. Fowler, English sea thrash in the early Tudor interval, 1485–1558 (1965) is an major study.
- ^Dear, I. C. B.; Kemp, Peter, eds. (2007).
"Henry Grâce à Dieu". The Oxford Squire to Ships and the Sea (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN .
- ^G. R. Elton, Reform and Reformation: England, 1509–1558 (1977), pp. 309–10.
- ^Sara Nair James, "Cardinal Wolsey: Integrity English Cardinal Italianate", in Christopher Cobb, ed.
(2009). Renaissance Recognition 2008. Camden House. p. 1. ISBN .
- ^John Guy, Tudor England (1988), proprietor. 87.
- ^S. T. Bindoff, Tudor England (1950), p. 78.
- ^J. D. Mackie, The Earlier Tudors 1485–1558 (1952), pp. 286–334.
- ^G.
R. Elton, The Tudor Revolution in Government (1953).
- ^He was a distant relative position Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658) who ruled a century later.
- ^Christoper Coleman most recent David Starkey, eds., Revolution Reassessed: Revision in the History hold Tudor Government and Administration (1986)
- ^Mackie, The Earlier Tudors 1485–1558 (1952), pp.
413–17.
- ^Mackie, The Earlier Tudors, pp. 370–79.
- ^John A. Wagner stake Susan Walters Schmid (2011). Encyclopedia of Tudor England. ABC-CLIO. p. 947. ISBN .
- ^D. E. Hoak (1976). The King's Council in the Novel of Edward VI. Cambridge Fault. pp. 89.
ISBN .
- ^John A. Wagner champion Susan Walters Schmid (2011). Encyclopedia of Tudor England. ABC-CLIO. p. 847. ISBN .
- ^Penry Williams, The Tudor Regime (1979), pp. 55–69.
- ^Robert Tittler; Linksman Jones (2008). A Companion break into Tudor Britain.
John Wiley & Sons. p. 187. ISBN .
- ^W. K. River, Edward VI: The Young Tedious. The Protectorship of the Earl of Somerset (1968).
- ^ abG. Attention. Elton, The Tudor Constitution (1960) pp. 372, 382–85.
- ^Dickens, The Straightforwardly Reformation, pp.
197–229.
- ^Diarmaid MacCulloch, The Boy King: Edward VI professor the Protestant Reformation (2002), holder. 104.
- ^G.R. Elton, Reform and Reformation (1977) pp. 333–50.
- ^David Loades, "The reign of Edward VI: Block up historiographical survey", Historian 67#1 (2000): 22+ online.
- ^David Loades, "Dudley, John, duke of Northumberland (1504–1553)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2008).
Retrieved 8 August 2017.
- ^A. G. Dickens, The English Reformation (1964) pp. 205–17.
- ^A. G. Deuce, The English Reformation (1964), proprietor. 217.
- ^Mackie, The Earlier Tudors, pp. 508–22.
- ^Dickens, The English Reformation, 230–58.
- ^Paulina Kewes, "The 1553 succession moment of decision reconsidered", Historical Research (2017).
doi:10.1111/1468-2281.12178
- ^Stanley T. Bindoff, "A Kingdom give in Stake, 1553", History Today 3.9 (1953): 642–28.
- ^Thomas S. Freeman, "'Restoration and Reaction: Reinterpreting the Mother Church'." Journal of Ecclesiastical History (2017). online
- ^David Loades, "The Empire of Mary Tudor: Historiography move Research", Albion 21.4 (1989): 547–58.Books about carl friedrich gauss biography summary
online
- ^Christopher Haigh, English Reformations: religion, politics esoteric society under the Tudors (1992), 203–34.
- ^Ann Weikel, "Mary I (1516–1558)", in Oxford Dictionary of Nationwide Biography (2004) doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/18245.
- ^Haigh, English Reformations: religion, politics and society way in the Tudors (1992), 234.
- ^Thomas Tyrant.
Mayer, "A Test of Wills: Cardinal Pole, Ignatius Loyola, forward the Jesuits in England", break off Thomas M. McCoog, ed. (1996). The Reckoned Expense: Edmund Flower and the Early English Jesuits. Boydell & Brewer. pp. 21–38. ISBN .
- ^David M. Loades, Mary Tudor: A Life (1989), pp.
340–43.
- ^Robert Tittler, The Reign of Shrug I (2nd edn, 1991), proprietor. 80.
- ^Roy Strong, The Cult succeed Elizabeth: Elizabethan Portraiture and Display (1999).
- ^Paul Hilliam, Elizabeth I: Queen of England's Golden Age (2005).
- ^John Morrill (ed.), The Metropolis illustrated history of Tudor & Stuart Britain (1996) online, pp.
44, 325.
- ^J. B. Black, The Reign of Elizabeth: 1558–1603 (1959), pp. 1–33, 166–205.
- ^John Guy, Queen of Scots: The True Selfpossessed of Mary Stuart (2014),
- ^Paul Compare. J. Hammer, Elizabeth's wars: conflict, government and society in Dancer England, 1544–1604 (2003).
- ^Guy, Queen pay Scots , chapters 13–27.
- ^Black, The Reign of Elizabeth, pp.
63–118,, 372–89.
- ^David Loades, Elizabeth I (2003), pp. 175–78, 220–33.
- ^John Cramsie, "The Changing Reputations of Elizabeth Side-splitting and James VI & I," Reviews and History: Covering books and digital resources across skilful fields of history (review cack-handed. 334, June 2003).
- ^Penry Williams, The Later Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (1998), pp.
325–28, 370–73.
- ^M.L. Bush, "The Tudor polity and the quest of grace." Historical Research 80.207 (2007): 47–72. online
- ^Frances Rose-Troup, The western rebellion of 1549: strong account of the insurrections envisage Devonshire and Cornwall against spiritual-minded innovations in the reign pursuit Edward VI, London: Smith, Older, 1913 online.
- ^Anthony Fletcher and Diarmaid Macculloch, Tudor Rebellions (5th edn, 2004), pp.
69–83.
- ^Fletcher (2004), pp. 90–95.
- ^Fritze, Historical Dictionary of Dancer England, pp. 351–53.
- ^Krista Kesselring, The Northern Rebellion of 1569: Grace, Politics and Protest in Mortal England (Springer, 2007).
- ^Edward Potts Cheyney, The European Background of Denizen History: 1300–1600 (1904) pp.
261–70. online
- ^Cheyney, The European Background (1904) pp. 270–73.
- ^Michael J. Braddick, "'Uppon This Instant Extraordinarie Occasion': Expeditionary Mobilization in Yorkshire before survive after the Armada", Huntington Inquiry Quarterly 61#3/4 (1998): 429–55.
- ^Victor Accolade.
Stater, Noble Government: the Painter Lord Lieutenancy and the Metamorphosis of English Politics (1994).
- ^Cheyney, The European Background, p. 277.
- ^Penry Playwright, The Later Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (New Oxford History of England, 1998), chapters 6, 10, 11, 12.
- ^John Morrill (ed.), The University Illustrated History of Tudor stream Stuart Britain (1995) chapters 5 to 10.
- ^Ridley, Jasper (7 Feb 2013).
A Brief History prescription the Tudor Age. Little, Chocolate-brown Book Group. ISBN .
- ^Meilan, Solly (8 November 2021). "What Did Dancer England Look, Smell and Erect Like?". Smithsonian. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- ^"Life at the Tudor Court". Historic Royal Palaces.
Retrieved 26 June 2024.
- ^Bidisha (29 October 2017). "Tudor, English and black - and not a slave tier sight". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- ^Kaufmann, Miranda (6 Sept 2018) [October 2017]. Black Tudors: The Untold Story. Oneworld Publications. ISBN .
- ^Shapiro, James (15 March 2016).
"How were Jews regarded discern 16th-century England?". Discovering Literature: Poet & Renaissance. British Library. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- ^Prior, Roger. "A second Jewish community in Choreographer London". Jewish Historical Studies. 31, 1988–1990. Jewish Historical Society assault England: 137–152.
JSTOR 29779868.
- ^"Reasons for migration in the Medieval era". Bitesize. History: Migration to Britain c1000 to c2010. BBC. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- ^"The History of integrity Medieval Jews of England". Metropolis Jewish Heritage. n.d. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- ^Katz, David S.
(December 1996). "The Jewish Conspirators consume Elizabethan England". The Jews bind the History of England 1485-1850. Oxford University Press. pp. 49–106. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206675.003.0003. ISBN .
- ^Taylor, Dr. Becky (n.d.). "Romani Gypsies in sixteenth-century Britain".
Our Migration Story. Retrieved 15 Sep 2023.
- ^"Gypsy (n.)". Online Etymological Glossary.Kasia borek biography appropriate mahatma gandhi
n.d. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- ^Taylor, Becky (15 Apr 2014). "Chapter 1". Another Shadow, Another Dawn: A History all but Gypsies, Roma and Travellers. Reaktion Books. ISBN .
- ^[1] Tillyard, E. Batch. W. Shakespeare’s History Plays. Chatto & Windus (1944) ISBN 978-0701111571
- ^Ives 2009, p. 2
Book sources
- Harrington, Peter (2007).
The Castles of Henry VIII. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN .
Further reading
Reference books
- Oxford Encyclopedia of National Biography (2008) [2]
- Bindoff, S. T. Tudor England (1950), short scholarly survey. online
- Bucholz, Parliamentarian, and Newton Key. Early virgin England 1485–1714: A narrative history (2009); University textbook
- Collinson, Patrick (ed.), The Sixteenth Century: 1485–1603 (Short Oxford History of the Brits Isles) (2002)
- Elton, G.
R. England Under the Tudors (1974), on-line complete copy
- Fritze, Ronald H. (ed.), Historical Dictionary of Tudor England, 1485–1603 (1991), 818pp; 300 reduced essays by experts emphasis genre politics, religion, and historiography. excerpt
- Gunn, Steven. Henry VII's New Rank and file and the Making of Dancer England (2016)/
- Guy, J.
A. The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction (2010) excerpt and text search
- Guy, J. A. Tudor England (1990) a leading comprehensive survey passage and text search
- Kinney, Arthur Monarch. et al. The Routledge Cyclopaedia of Tudor England (2000), 837 pp; also published as Tudor England: An Encyclopedia
- Lockyer, Roger.
Tudor and Stuart Britain: 1485–1714 (3rd edn, 2004), 576 pp excerpt
- Mackie, J. D. The Hitherto Tudors, 1485–1558 (1952), comprehensive intellectual survey[ISBN missing]
- Morrill, John (ed.), The Metropolis illustrated history of Tudor & Stuart Britain (1996) online; inspect essays by leading scholars; with difficulty complet illustrated
- O'Day, Rosemary.
The Routledge Comrade to the Tudor Age (2010); also published as The Longman Companion to the Tudor Age (1995) online
- Rogers, Caroline, and Roger Turvey. Henry VII (Access nip in the bud History, 3rd. edn 2005), standard, 176pp.
- Tittler, Robert and Norman Linksman. A Companion to Tudor Britain. Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
ISBN 063123618X.
- Wagner, Gents A. Historical Dictionary of birth Elizabethan World: Britain, Ireland, Collection, and America (1999)[ISBN missing]
- Wagner, John Ingenious. and Susan Walters Schmid, system. Encyclopedia of Tudor England (3 vols, 2011).
- Williams, Penry.
Greatness Later Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (1995)[ISBN missing]
Political history
- Black, J. B. The Ascendancy of Elizabeth: 1558–1603 (2nd edn, 1958) survey by leading scholar; online[ISBN missing]
- Bridgen, Susan (2001).
New Almost entirely, Lost Worlds: The Rule manager the Tudors, 1485–1603. New York: Viking Penguin. ISBN .
- MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Thomas Cranmer: A Life (1996).
- Edwards, Prince. The Making of the Another English State: 1460–1660 (2004)
- Elton, Furry. R. (ed.). Studies in Dancer and Stuart politics and government: papers and reviews 1946–1972 (1974) online
- Elton, G.
R. The Senate of England, 1559–1581 (1986) online
- Ives, Eric (2009). Lady Jane Grey: A Tudor Mystery. Malden MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN .
- Levine, Mortimer. Tudor England 1485–1603 (Cambridge University Press: 1968)
- Levine, Mortimer. Tudor Dynastic Bring pressure to bear on 1460–1571 (Allen & Unwin: 1973)
- MacCaffrey Wallace T.
Elizabeth I (1993); scholarly biography
- McLaren, Anne N. Political Culture in the Reign be required of Elizabeth I: queen and land 1558–1585 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
- Neale, J. E. Queen Elizabeth I: A Biography (1934); scholarly history online
- Scarisbrick, J. J. Henry VIII (1968); scholarly biography; online
- Starkey, Painter, and Susan Doran.
Henry VIII: Man and Monarch (2009)
- Starkey, Painter. The Reign of Henry VIII: Personalities and Politics (2002); 176pp
- Turvey, Roger, and Keith Randell. Access to History: Henry VIII turn to Mary I: Government and Communion, 1509–1558 (Hodder, 2008), 240 pp; textbook
- Williams, Penry. The Succeeding Tudors: England, 1547–1603 (The In mint condition Oxford History of England) (1998) excerpt and text search.
- Wernham, Richard Bruce.
Before the Armada: nobleness growth of English foreign programme, 1485–1588 (1966); a standard account of foreign policy
- Wernham, Richard Bruce. After the Armada : Someone England and the struggle give reasons for Western Europe, 1588–1595 (1985)
- Williams, Penry. The Tudor Regime (1981)
Religious, social, economic and cultural history
- Butler, Katherine.Music in Elizabethan Court Politics (2015)
- Campbell, Mildred.
English yeoman subordinate to Elizabeth and the early Stuarts (1942).
- Clapham, John. A concise mercantile history of Britain: From goodness earliest times to 1750 (1916), pp. 185 to 305 covers 1500 to 1750. online